Skip to content
Systems & Soul
(07) Adoption in the Real World

Nobody Gets to Rewrite What You Wrote Down in Public

October 12, 2026 6 min read

I have a video out there from right after ChatGPT launched, one of the first explainers I recorded about what AI agents could do for a contractor’s website. The framing is bad. The lighting is worse. I say “um” more times than I care to count, and I trail off mid-sentence because my brain is outrunning my mouth.

Three people commented. It is not a good video.

But it captures something I’m glad I didn’t wait to document: what I was exploring, what I understood at the time, and where I thought the technology could go.

I date my AI-building era to November 30, 2022, the day ChatGPT launched. For four years, I’ve opened my keynote by saying I have barely slept since. Anyone can hear that line today. The early videos let them see the work that followed it.

That is the value of documenting your work in public. People can trace how an idea developed rather than relying entirely on what you remember about it later. And if you lead a business, that record can do more than support your credibility. It can help your team understand how decisions were made and what those decisions taught you.

Why documenting decisions matters

Once you know how something turned out, it becomes difficult to remember how uncertain it felt at the beginning. You remember the decision that worked. You forget the three approaches you abandoned before reaching it.

Other people remember differently. Someone who joined halfway through may never have seen the early experiments. A customer may know the finished product without understanding why you built it. Even your own team can lose that context as responsibilities change.

A dated record gives everyone something specific to return to.

It won’t prevent every disagreement about events or credit. But a post, demonstration, or published explanation can establish what you were working on and saying at a particular moment. You have something more reliable than competing recollections.

For a business owner, that is useful long before anyone questions your story. It helps you explain a change, revisit an assumption, and recognize the people who contributed along the way.

What belongs in a useful public record

Our own company’s websites moved from WordPress to Webflow to Hydra OS. We documented that progression publicly, including experiments, problems, and rebuilds.

The useful part of that history is the reasoning behind the moves. A finished website shows what exists now. An explanation published during a migration helps people understand what we were trying to improve and what we were learning as we did it.

When Stephanie Allen and I started Just Start AI in 2025, we described it as learning out loud with contractors. Recording that work meant people could follow the questions and experiments as they developed. They could see our thinking change.

Other records serve different purposes. My book, Hands Up: A CEO’s Letter to the Generation That Will Inherit What We Build, preserves what I chose to put in writing at that stage of my leadership. A keynote recording captures what I was prepared to stand behind in front of an audience.

Each is a record of a particular moment. None tells the entire story alone.

The same is true of documenting organizational change. I took this company from 320 people to 38. A number that significant needs context about the decisions and the people affected. Documenting during the process preserves more of that context than a retrospective account can, including what remained unresolved at the time.

You don’t need a book or a stage to begin. A useful record can be a short post explaining:

  • What problem you were trying to solve.
  • What you tried and who contributed.
  • What happened, including what didn’t work.
  • What you will do differently next.

That is enough to give a future reader something meaningful to understand.

Publish while the details are fresh

The discipline is simple: document the learning close to when it happens.

If you wait six months to explain an experiment, you will probably remember the result better than the reasoning. Write it down that week, while you still remember the question that started it and the limitation you didn’t anticipate.

Choose a format you can sustain. A short video may be easier than an article. A few paragraphs and a screenshot may explain more than either. You can start with a voice memo, then turn it into something other people can use.

Give yourself thirty minutes for a first draft. Before publishing, check the facts, credit the contributors, and remove anything confidential. Make the explanation clear enough for someone who wasn’t in the meeting.

Then publish it. Better lighting can wait if the idea is already understandable.

My early video is useful because it captures a real stage of the work. Its imperfections are incidental. You don’t have to make something look rough to make it credible, and you don’t have to wait for professional production to share something worth knowing.

Include the attempts that fell short, too. Explain what failed and what changed afterward. That context helps someone else judge whether your lesson applies to their business.

Help your team use what you document

A founder can move through an idea quickly and forget that everyone else still needs an explanation. Documenting the reasoning gives people a way to catch up, ask questions, and contribute.

But publishing alone doesn’t make that happen. Your team needs to know where the material is and why it matters.

For example, a short explanation of an unsuccessful software test could become part of a team discussion: What limitation did we find? Does it affect another workflow? What should we check before trying again?

Save that explanation somewhere searchable, and a new employee can find it later. They can understand why the company made a choice without needing someone to reconstruct the entire conversation.

Over time, these records can reveal how you evaluate ideas. People see which questions you ask, what evidence changes your mind, and when you decide to stop an experiment. That gives them more to work with when they face a decision of their own.

Public documentation also invites questions from outside the company. Someone may notice a gap, offer a different experience, or challenge an assumption. If you revise your approach, document that too. Showing why your thinking changed is part of being accountable for it.

Start Friday

Every Friday for the next month, publish one useful thing you learned that week.

Choose a decision, an experiment, or a problem you solved. Explain enough for someone else to learn from it. Name the people who helped. If the outcome is still uncertain, say so.

Share it with your team and keep a copy somewhere you control. At the end of the month, look at what you have: four accounts written while the details were fresh, each preserving something you might otherwise have forgotten.

Keep going, and you will have a history you can refer to, a body of work others can examine, and lessons your team can use.

Nobody gets to rewrite what you wrote down in public. They can interpret it differently. You may revisit it yourself. But you have given people something concrete to read, watch, and evaluate.

Write it down while you’re doing the work.

Keep reading: The Importance of Documentation and From 320 People to 38.